Page 26 - 35_DS702_E_2014_Lightning_Protection_Guide
P. 26

particularly remarkable. With an average of 8 short strokes
       (either superimposed on the long stroke or subsequent to the   total current [kA]
       long stroke), considerably more impulse currents were record-  0.5
       ed than the 3 to 4 subsequent strokes which typically occur in
       case of downward flashes. Thus, the 3 to 4 impulse discharges   0.0
       per flash stated in the lightning protection standards only ap-  -0.5
       ply to downward flashes.
       For  10  years  (2000  to  2009), ALDIS  has  been  recording  10   -1.0
       flashes with total charges exceeding the maximum charge val-
       ue of 300 As depending on the lightning protection level (LPL).   -1.5
       These high charge values were recorded only during winter
       thunderstorms. In the first measuring period, the mobile sys-  -2.0
       tem also recorded long strokes during winter thunderstorms
       with  higher  charges  than  the  charges  specified  for  LPL  I.    -2.5
       Figure 2.8.2 shows a long stroke with a charge of 405 As   0  100  200  300  400  500  600  700  800
       recorded in January 2007. These extreme loads, which exceed                      time [ms]
       the charge value of 300 As of LPL I, may have to be taken
       into account when taking lightning protection measures for   Figure 2.8.2  Long stroke with superimposed impulse currents of
       high structures at exposed locations such as wind turbines and   an upward flash with a total charge of approximately
       transmitters.                                         405 As – recorded at the Gaisberg transmission mast
                                                             during a winter thunderstorm
       Negative downward flash and the associated partial
       lightning current
       A negative cloud-to-earth flash was recorded during the light-  5
       ning current measurements. Compared to the previously de-  0                  ALDIS
                                                          -5
       scribed upward flashes, this downward flash is characterised   total current [kA]  -10  DEHN
       by  a  considerably  higher  short  strokes  value.  The  detected   -15  subsequent
       negative  downward  flash  has  a  maximum  current  of  about     -20  M-component
       29 kA and a charge of about 4.4 As. Figure 2.8.3 shows a   -25  negative
       comparison between the current curves recorded by the scien-  -30  short stroke
       tific ALDIS measuring system and the mobile lightning current
       detection system. Both current curves are in good agreement.   20
       Another slowly increasing negative lightning current of about    0
       5 kA is superimposed on the decreasing short stroke. In light-  -20
                                                         -40
       ning research, this characteristic lightning current component is   -60
       referred to as M-component. In the second measuring period,   partial current [A] power supply line  -80
       the mobile lightning current detection system also recorded   -100
       partial currents in one of the low-voltage cables installed be-  -120
       tween the platform at a height of 80 m and the operations
       building at the foot due to the high number of measuring chan-  0  0.2  0.4  0.6  0.8
       nels. Between these two installation points, there are numerous                  time [ms]
       parallel discharge paths for the lightning current. The lightning   Figure 2.8.3  Negative downward flash with M-component (top)
       current splits between the metal mast structure and the numer-  and partial lightning current in a power supply line
       ous power supply, data and antenna cables. Thus, the measured   (below) – recorded at the Gaisberg transmission mast
       absolute value of the partial lightning current in a single low-
       voltage cable does not provide any useful information. How-
       ever, it was verified that the partial lightning current in the low-
       voltage cable under consideration has the same polarity as well
       as a wave form and current flow duration comparable to the
       primary lightning current at the top of the tower. Consequently,
       a surge protective device installed to protect this cable must be
       capable of discharging partial lightning currents.



            www.dehn-international.com                              LIGHTNING PROTECTION GUIDE  25
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31