Page 93 - 35_DS702_E_2014_Lightning_Protection_Guide
P. 93

¨  Material characteristics
            The performance of the material is determined by the cross-
            sectional values, modulus of elasticity, density and lateral
            contraction.
          ¨  Loads
            The wind load is applied to the geometric model in the form
            of a pressure load.

          The break resistance is determined by comparing the permis-
          sible bending stress (material property) and the maximum
          bending stress (calculated from the bending moment and the
          effective cross-section at the point of maximum stress).
          Break resistance is achieved if the ratio between the permis-
          sible and the actual bending stress is > 1. Basically, the same
          also applies in this case: The greater the ratio between the
          permissible and the actual bending stress, the greater is the
          break resistance.
                                                       Figure 5.1.11.6  FEM model of a self-supporting air-termination rod
                                                                  without brace (length = 8.5 m)
          The FEM calculation model was used to calculate the actual
          bending moments for two air-termination rods (length = 8.5 m)
          with and without braces as a function of their height (Figure
          5.1.11.5). This clearly shows the impact of the braces on the   Implementation
          moments. While the maximum bending moment for the air-  Braces create an additional “supporting point” which signifi-
          termination rod without brace is about 1270 Nm in the clamp-  cantly reduces the bending stress in the air-termination rod.
          ing point, the bending moment for the air-termination rod with   Without additional braces, the air-termination rods would not
                                                       withstand the stress of wind zone 2. Therefore, air-termination
          brace is reduced to about 460 Nm. This brace allows to reduce   rods higher than 6 m are equipped with braces.
          the stress in the air-termination rod to such an extent that, for
          the maximum expected wind loads, the strength of the materi-  In addition to the bending moments, the FEM calculation also
          als used is not exceeded and the air-termination rod is not   provides the stress in the braces whose stability must also be
          destroyed.
                                                       proven.
                                                       Determination of the wind-load-dependent
                                                       deflection of the air-termination rod
                                                       A further important value to be calculated by means of the
                                                       FEM model is the deflection of the tip of the air-termination
                                                       rod. Air-termination rods are deflected by wind loads. This de-
                                                       flection changes the volume to be protected. Objects requir-
                                                       ing protection are no longer located in the protected volume
                                                       and / or proximities can no longer be maintained.
                                                       Figures 5.1.11.6 and 5.1.11.7 show the use of the calcula-
                                                       tion model for a self-supporting air-termination rod with and
                                                       without braces. In this example, the tip of the air-termination
                                                       rod with brace is displaced by approximately 1150 mm. With-
                                                       out brace there would be a deflection of about 3740 mm, a
                                                       theoretical value which exceeds the breaking limit of the air-
                                                       termination rod under consideration.

          Figure 5.1.11.5  Comparison of the bending moments of self-  Implementation
                    supporting air-termination rods with and without   Above a certain rod height, additional braces significantly re-
                    braces (length = 8.5 m)            duce this defection and the bending stress on the rod.



          92  LIGHTNING PROTECTION GUIDE                             www.dehn-international.com
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98